CMS vs. Static Web Design

Static web design includes static web page which is delivered to users exactly the way it is stored unlike the dynamic web page which are generated by the web application. It displays the same information for all users.

CMS stands for Content Management System. It is a system which allows adding, editing, updating and deleting the website content very easily in very less time through administrative rights to the site and database.

Static website generally uses basic HTML for designing while CMS use server side languages for scripting like PHP, .NET, ASP.

Difference:

As far as the front end of both the systems is considered there is not much difference between the 2 systems. The main difference is in the background i.e., The static site is normally built in XHTML/CSS while the technology behind a CMS is PHP which is a very powerful language.

CMS:

The shelf life of the site is increased if it is made using CMS:

If a site gets old by few users it becomes static and then it needs redesigning. The changes made in this older site costs more than the initial site development because new features are added to the site than the previous version. If a site is a CMS based than just by making changes to templates because rest of things evolve over time.

No need to reformat existing and archived content.

After the site gets a bit old it is necessary to make a few changes like fresh layout. If a site is static requires complete redesign but if it is a CMS based than just making changes in the layout changes all the archived and current content as well.

CMS allows changes after the site is made live

Once the site goes live usually many possibilities rise which are related to making changes in the site. In such times changing a static website is very costly as discussed earlier but a CMS based site adding new sections, implementing extranets or anything else is very easy.

Content management is easy:

New content can be easily added and updated anytime. This keeps the website upgraded with fresh information every time users visits it.

Static:

As there are advantage and disadvantage in CMS design in the same way there are few advantages and disadvantages in Static web design too:

• It is simpler to create
• Can be easily loaded even at lower bandwidths
• Less cost is involved
• On the long run if updates are frequent then it would be costly
• Lacks functionality

So after looking at all these points it is quite clear that how you decide for the design process to go with depends on various factors. With new technologies coming up in regular time intervals the websites using CMS design can be easily updated without waiting for designer for updating like in static design.

Web design is an important aspect of website creation. It gives the feel of the site which helps in getting the users back to the site. Web design in London is famous for its extraordinary performance in designing for all its clients.

Summary: Both the designing techniques has its pros and cons. But CMS should be given preference for web designing in today?s virtual market to keep the site better than others and to reduce the cost.

Author Bio:
Kristina likes to share information about dot net development services. She also like write on various web-based development tools and trends that surface every now and then.?

Source: http://www.e-junkie.info/2012/09/cms-vs-static-web-design.html

all star game oscar red carpet daytona 500 start time ryan zimmerman oscars red carpet jennifer lopez wardrobe malfunction hugo